Web Desk: Maulana Fazlur Rehman’s Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam-Fazl (JUI-F) has suffered a significant legal setback after Pakistan’s Federal Constitutional Court dismissed the party’s appeal in a dispute over a reserved seat, upholding the Election Commission of Pakistan’s (ECP) decision.
A two-member bench comprising Chief Justice Aminuddin Khan and Justice Aamer Farooq heard the petition challenging the electoral body’s handling of the party’s list of candidates nominated for reserved seats.
The ruling brings an end to JUI-F’s appeal before the bench, dealing a blow to the party’s efforts to overturn the commission’s decision.
During the hearing, counsel representing JUI-F argued that the party had submitted four names to the Election Commission for consideration against reserved seats.
However, the lawyer maintained that the electoral authority had no legal power to independently alter the list submitted by a political party.
According to the party’s counsel, the Election Commission was required to respect the nominations formally submitted by JUI-F rather than make changes without the party’s approval.
The lawyer further argued that the dispute raised important questions about the extent of the commission’s authority over political parties’ nomination lists.
Meanwhile, the proceedings focused on the disputed nomination of Sadaf Ehsan, whom JUI-F maintained it had not nominated as its candidate.
Describing the matter as an unusual case in Pakistan’s electoral history, the party’s lawyer questioned how a person could be treated as a political party’s nominee when the party itself disputed that nomination.
The counsel told the court that JUI-F had explicitly rejected Sadaf Ehsan’s status as its candidate, yet the Election Commission’s decision continued to recognise her as the party’s nominee.
He argued that such a determination disregarded the party’s position and raised concerns about its right to select candidates for reserved seats.
Furthermore, JUI-F’s counsel argued that if the Election Commission had identified an error, omission or discrepancy in the submitted list, it should have approached the party for clarification or correction.
The lawyer maintained that seeking clarification was fundamentally different from independently modifying a political party’s nominations.
He insisted that the electoral body could not substitute its own decision for the party’s formally communicated choices.
The counsel also questioned the legal basis for recognising a candidate whose nomination was disputed by the party concerned.
Despite the arguments presented by JUI-F, the Federal Constitutional Court declined to interfere with the Election Commission’s decision.
The two-member bench dismissed the party’s appeal and upheld the electoral authority’s earlier determination in the reserved seat dispute.
As a result, JUI-F failed to secure the judicial relief it had sought against the commission’s decision.
The ruling leaves the ECP’s decision in place and marks a significant setback for the party in its legal challenge over the disputed nomination.
The outcome represents another important development in the continuing legal and political debate surrounding reserved seats and the authority of electoral institutions in Pakistan.
At the centre of the dispute was whether the Election Commission could recognise a candidate whose nomination was contested by the political party concerned.
While JUI-F maintained that the commission had exceeded its authority, the court rejected the party’s appeal and allowed the ECP’s decision to stand.
Read more: We will not be intimidated by JUI-F threats, Azaad Digital CEO
