Web Desk: An eight-month investigation by The News Investigation Cell has uncovered an alleged attempt by a network to recruit a Pakistani journalist to publish externally prepared political articles and provide access to non-public information in exchange for financial incentives and possible future assistance.
The investigation documented a series of communications, recorded conversations, financial transactions and draft articles that investigators said showed a structured effort to build a long-term relationship with the journalist.
The News said it could not independently determine who funded the operation, who authored the supplied articles or who directed the individuals involved. It also could not verify claims about any organizational affiliation.
Given the potential national security implications, The News Investigation Cell said it informed relevant government authorities about the findings.
The investigation was conducted under the editorial supervision of Editor Investigation Ansar Abbasi to document the alleged recruitment methods and preserve evidence of the interaction.
According to the investigation, the operation involved repeated discussions about publishing political content, gathering sensitive information and creating financial and personal incentives for continued cooperation.
The first contact reportedly took place through Facebook in November 2025 when a woman claiming to represent a Dubai-based public relations company approached the journalist.
Initially, she presented the interaction as a search for journalists who could help publish opinion articles internationally. However, according to the investigation, the discussions later shifted toward arranging publication of ready-made political articles in Pakistani media outlets.
The woman reportedly sought details about the journalist’s professional background, media connections and the country’s opinion journalism landscape, including which publications had the greatest influence and how articles were approved.
The investigation said the network later provided three publication-ready opinion pieces covering topics including Pakistan’s military leadership, the government’s economic narrative, the Special Investment Facilitation Council (SIFC), Pakistan-China relations, Afghanistan and Balochistan.
According to the findings, the journalist was not asked to write, verify or independently report the articles but was instead expected to facilitate their publication.
One article was reportedly revised at the operative’s direction to specifically mention Pakistan’s military chief and Punjab’s chief minister.
The investigation said the articles lacked supporting documentation or source material, while claims were supported with references to social media posts and statements from Pakistan-critical activists based abroad.
As discussions progressed, the operative allegedly offered payment for arranging publication of the first article, proposing an initial amount of Rs70,000 with an advance payment.
The investigation said she repeatedly requested that payments be received through cryptocurrency and encouraged the journalist to create a crypto wallet. After those requests were declined, an advance payment was sent through a digital wallet.
The News said an initial review indicated that the transaction originated from an outlet in a remote area of Sindh, while the operative communicated through a UK-based phone number and claimed to represent a Dubai-based company.
The investigation could not independently verify the origin of the funds.
Later, another payment of Rs68,000 was transferred through cryptocurrency, bringing the total amount received during the investigation to Rs103,000, according to The News.
Over time, the investigation said the engagement moved beyond publishing opinion pieces.
The operative allegedly asked whether the journalist could obtain information that had not yet become public, particularly regarding developments along the Pakistan-Afghanistan border.
She also sought information about contacts within government departments and other institutions, suggesting that the proposed cooperation could extend beyond media placement.
The journalist did not provide unpublished information or agree to obtain confidential material, according to the investigation.
During the final phase of the operation, the journalist questioned whether the network could be linked to a foreign agency rather than a public relations firm.
According to The News, instead of ending the conversation, the operative discussed possible relocation arrangements if the operation became exposed.
She offered assistance in securing employment abroad and relocating the journalist and his family, saying she would consult her superiors regarding the arrangements.
The following day, a man claiming to be her superior contacted the journalist through the same WhatsApp number.
During the recorded conversation, the man allegedly agreed to revised financial terms, offering Rs170,000 per article, including Rs70,000 for publication-related expenses and Rs100,000 for the journalist.
The caller also discussed possible visa arrangements for the journalist, his wife and children if relocation became necessary, according to the investigation.
He allegedly claimed the journalist could find opportunities in international media organizations, citing examples of Afghan journalists. The News said it could not independently verify those claims.
During the conversation, the caller also claimed he had played “a small role” in the Pegasus spyware controversy, an assertion that The News said it could not independently confirm.
When questioned again about whether the operation resembled the methods of an intelligence agency, the caller rejected the suggestion and told the journalist he was “going in the wrong direction.”
The investigation noted that the caller’s accent and language did not appear Pakistani, but it did not establish his identity.
Despite documenting financial offers, political articles prepared outside the newsroom and requests for unpublished information, The News Investigation Cell said it could not determine the ultimate source behind the network.
The investigation concluded that the available evidence showed an organised attempt to establish a relationship involving media influence, financial incentives and access to information, while the identities and affiliations of those involved remain unverified.
Read more: Fitna al-Khawarij facilitator Zafaryab arrested, investigation reveals new details
