Web Desk: Federal Constitutional Court has overturned an earlier order to demolish Islamabad’s Monal Restaurant, giving a new direction to the long-running legal dispute involving the popular Pir Sohawa landmark in the Margalla Hills.
The court accepted appeals filed by the Capital Development Authority (CDA) and the Metropolitan Corporation Islamabad (MCI), while ending the stay order that had remained in effect during the proceedings.
However, the ruling does not immediately settle the ownership dispute. Instead, the court directed the relevant trial courts to independently decide questions related to land ownership and other legal claims.
In its decision, the Federal Constitutional Court stated that trial courts must resolve the property dispute without being influenced by observations made during the constitutional proceedings.
The court emphasized that matters involving land ownership and legal rights fall within the jurisdiction of lower courts, which should examine evidence and arguments before reaching a final conclusion.
At the same time, the court clarified that administrative and regulatory matters should be handled by the relevant authorities within their legal powers.
The court directed trial courts to complete all connected cases without unnecessary delays, saying a swift resolution was needed to end the prolonged legal uncertainty surrounding the restaurant.
During the hearing, Justice Hassan Azhar Rizvi observed that the previous judgment had overlooked several important legal issues.
He said courts must decide cases according to law and merit rather than reacting emotionally to the filing of petitions or review applications.
The judge also stressed that judicial decisions should remain focused on relevant legal issues and avoid unnecessary observations unrelated to the proceedings.
Justice Rizvi said court rulings should be based on the case record, arguments presented by parties and applicable legal principles, rather than including commentary beyond the scope of the dispute.
The latest ruling has moved the Monal Restaurant dispute into another phase, with trial courts now responsible for determining ownership-related questions while government bodies retain authority over regulatory matters.
The restaurant, located at one of Islamabad’s most prominent viewpoints, has remained at the centre of a legal debate involving land rights, government authority and regulatory oversight.
Following the verdict, the future of Monal will depend on decisions by the relevant courts and authorities handling the remaining legal and administrative issues.
Legal observers say the decision could have broader implications beyond the Monal case by defining the boundaries between judicial review and administrative authority.
The ruling provides guidance for future disputes where courts, government institutions and private parties are involved in questions of property rights, regulation and public administration.
As the case moves forward, the final outcome will depend on how trial courts address ownership claims and how regulatory bodies proceed within the framework of the law.
Read more: PM Shehbaz announces nationwide mourning on demise of former Qatari ruler
