Aleema Khan’s non-bailable arrest warrant in progress

The Anti-Terrorism Court Rawalpindi has issued a non-bailable arrest warrant for Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder Imran Khan in a case related to the November 26, 2022 protest. The court has also issued an order to indict the alleged accused at the next hearing, rejecting his request for one-day exemption from appearance. Also read:Imran Khan told that your sister Aleema Khan has a role to play in dividing the party: Ali Amin Gandapur
The case registered at the police station Sadiqabad on Wednesday was heard at the Anti-Terrorism Court Rawalpindi, where Aleema Khan was to be formally charged in the case. However, on the absence of Aleema Khan, her alleged lawyers Faisal Malik and Hassanin Sanbal filed a request from the court for an exemption from her appearance for one day. Objections to an exemption request
Public Prosecutor Zaheer Shah, objecting to the exemption request, took the position that Faisal Malik and Hasnain Sanbal do not have Aleema Khan's advocacy and do not have the legal authority to represent them in court. He took the position that no one can advocate without an advocate under Section 22 of the Legal Practitioner and Bar Council Act, so this application is unacceptable and bogus. Court decision
The court acknowledged the prosecutor's objections and dismissed the petition filed without an advocate as inadmissible. Simultaneously, the court issued an arrest warrant for Aleema Khan's non-bailable arrest warrant and issued an order to indict the accused on October 11 at the next hearing. Read more:Aleema Khanum sentenced to up to 7 years in 26 November trial, Hassan Ayyub gives big news
Case background
The case was filed in the wake of a protest by the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf on 26 November 2022, accusing Aleema Khan and others of incitement, disturbance of public order and speeches against state institutions. Upcoming legal action
According to the court order, if Aleema Khan does not appear in court on October 11, further legal action may be taken against her, which may include property alienation and advertising proceedings.